ooli3@sopuli.xyz to Science@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoNew psychology research uncovers surprisingly consistent misjudgments of tattooed individualswww.psypost.orgexternal-linkmessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1173arrow-down18
arrow-up1165arrow-down1external-linkNew psychology research uncovers surprisingly consistent misjudgments of tattooed individualswww.psypost.orgooli3@sopuli.xyz to Science@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·2 days agoOhhh. The headline made it sound like people who get tattoos make poor decisions.
minus-squaredolphin @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoThe article says people’s opinions about a tatooed person does not necessarily match the tattooed person’s view on themself. The article was frustrating to read because it lacked details.
minus-squareunwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoOn my first read, I got the meaning right. However, I agree that it’s very ambiguous. Were the “of” a “by”, I’d swing the other way as well.
Ohhh. The headline made it sound like people who get tattoos make poor decisions.
The article says people’s opinions about a tatooed person does not necessarily match the tattooed person’s view on themself. The article was frustrating to read because it lacked details.
On my first read, I got the meaning right. However, I agree that it’s very ambiguous. Were the “of” a “by”, I’d swing the other way as well.