weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 10 days agoNot fairsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down12
arrow-up125arrow-down1imageNot fairsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square22linkfedilink
minus-squareKaryoplasma@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoDoesn’t have the famous ln(640320³ + 744)/√163 for some reason. Accurate to 14 decimal places I believe which is more accurate than what you need for 99.9% of its applications.
minus-squaremoody@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·10 days agoIt’s been said that with 15 decimals, you can calculate the circumference on the observable universe with a precision of the width of an atom.
minus-squareODuffer @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-210 days agoNot quite, according to JPL https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do-we-really-need/ 15 decimal places, for Voyager 1 - We have a circle more than 94 billion miles (more than 150 billion kilometers) around, and our calculation of that distance would be off by no more than the width of your little finger.
Doesn’t have the famous
for some reason. Accurate to 14 decimal places I believe which is more accurate than what you need for 99.9% of its applications.
It’s been said that with 15 decimals, you can calculate the circumference on the observable universe with a precision of the width of an atom.
Not quite, according to JPL https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do-we-really-need/
15 decimal places, for Voyager 1 - We have a circle more than 94 billion miles (more than 150 billion kilometers) around, and our calculation of that distance would be off by no more than the width of your little finger.