Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoScientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviewswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square11linkfedilinkarrow-up1101arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1101arrow-down1external-linkScientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviewswww.theguardian.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square11linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareDaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 month agoOr maybe AI shouldn’t review things? Who knows what they are hallucinating.
minus-squareMysteriousSophon21@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThis is the biggest issue - peer review is supposed to be about critical analysis and domain expertise, not just following promts blindly, and no AI today has actual scientific understanding to catch subtle methodological flaws.
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoYeah absolutely, but researchers who are attempting skirt review processes to only receice positive feedback are not respecting the process.
minus-squareCrypticCoffee@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoWhat’s to respect in an AI review where they didn’t even review the output. It’s an LLM lazy review. Deserves to be gamed.
minus-squareSquizzy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoYes, the reviewers should not be using it. The researcher shouldnt be submitting it with the intention of gaming it. AI is not all LLM chat bots, there are legitimate AI implementations used in research.
Or maybe AI shouldn’t review things? Who knows what they are hallucinating.
This is the biggest issue - peer review is supposed to be about critical analysis and domain expertise, not just following promts blindly, and no AI today has actual scientific understanding to catch subtle methodological flaws.
Yeah absolutely, but researchers who are attempting skirt review processes to only receice positive feedback are not respecting the process.
What’s to respect in an AI review where they didn’t even review the output. It’s an LLM lazy review. Deserves to be gamed.
Yes, the reviewers should not be using it. The researcher shouldnt be submitting it with the intention of gaming it.
AI is not all LLM chat bots, there are legitimate AI implementations used in research.