• Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Maybe that CEO will also quit, because other companies offer them a higher salary.

          It’s so easy to say they should just pay their CEO less. I mean, I get it, it’s a ridiculous amount of money that no one needs. But few people, who are qualified for that job, will just do it out of the goodness of their hearts for a salary far below industry standards.

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is predicated on the assumption that a CEOs skill is directly related to their salary.

            This may or may not be the case.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe that’s not bad for firefox.

    Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects and just focus on delivering a good browser.

    Algo the lack of google as financial support means they’ll rely more on donations, which would mean that they really need to focus on offering a good browser.

    I’ll gladly donate to firefox if I would see they are really focusing on it.

  • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    • Mozilla will take money from Microsoft
    • Firefox gets Office 365, Exchange, and Azure AD integration
    • Netflix partners with Microsoft for advanced HD and DRM
    • Microsoft and Mozilla partner to deliver Microsoft-enhanced Firefox for Windows
    • ActiveX 2.0
  • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I hope Mozilla put most of that Google money into index funds or something. At least it didn’t go into paying the developers.