• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    Do you think a vibrator being involved and being a meaningful part of an orgasm are mutually exclusive? Hint: They’re absolutely not.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      What part are you playing, that is as equally meaningful as being the direct stimulus that is necessary for orgasm, that isn’t also present when one is the direct stimulus? Being what brings a woman to orgasm is about as meaningful as it gets when it to comes to sex, next to the intimacy.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        If you believe the only reason to have sex is to reach an orgasm and that the only valuable contribution to it is being the one that does it, then sure, but there’s so much more to it than that.

        Now, I wanna be clear. I’m not telling you how to have sex. I’m not saying the way you want to have it is wrong. If you want to be the one doing it and no vibrators involved, there’s nothing wrong with that. But acting like that’s the only way to have sex? No, there are so many more.