kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square117linkfedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down15
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkJava at 30: How a language designed for a failed gadget became a global powerhousewww.zdnet.comkirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square117linkfedilink
minus-squarechakan2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·5 days agoThey did, but it makes me sad. Python is becoming the next JavaScript because of its ease of use. The Java guys simply don’t understand how to code without the gang of 4 crutch to lean on.
minus-squaregedhrel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoSome of the GoF patterns over-emphasise inheritance, but by-and-large, you don’t build large systems without either using or rediscovering software patterns, whether they’re OO, FP, or what-have-you.
minus-squareoporko@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoThey’re talking about this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns
They did, but it makes me sad. Python is becoming the next JavaScript because of its ease of use.
The Java guys simply don’t understand how to code without the gang of 4 crutch to lean on.
Some of the GoF patterns over-emphasise inheritance, but by-and-large, you don’t build large systems without either using or rediscovering software patterns, whether they’re OO, FP, or what-have-you.
Gang of Four?
They’re talking about this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns