Dude, you claim that they’re Nazis because they get rid of soviet monuments. I give you a whole page filled with Holocaust memorials that are perfectly fine there, which would have obviously been removed as well if your claim had any validity. And all you come up with is a) “how dare you post that” and now b) “your words don’t make sense”. This is dumb and citing Sartre doesn’t make it any less dumb. Come up with valid arguments or just deal with me saying “nah” if your point is crap.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
Or maybe, just maybe, getting rid of those that try to symbolise liberation but do so glorifying oppressors while leaving those that don’t do the latter is merely some good judgement and not nazism. 🤷
“People want to get rid of statues that once symbolised liberation but now are associated with oppression. They must be Nazis and everybody who disagrees with that must be a fake news spreading fascist!”
Keep spreading Russian propaganda if it makes you happy. Still doesn’t mean you’re right.
It doesn’t. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Monuments that glorify Soviets might be torn down for a plethora of reasons that don’t have anything to do with nazism and have a lot to do with Soviet atrocities.
Asetru@feddit.orgto linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Your favorite font for terminal and GTK/QT apps?6·2 days agoYeah, Fira Code gang!
I, too, like my ls to show titty colours.
Now you got the spirit.