There are no oceans made of sodium and water. There couldn’t even be because sodium and water would react to NaOH and H3O+. There are oceans of water and sodium chlorate because smart people are made from chlorine…

Barium salts might last a bit longer - and there’s no “best before” on most salts of nitric acids. They certainly were best before you spotted them…

Abilities are a Chinese hoax anyway. Do I have any abilities? Do you? Told you so. Hoax.

Maybe it’s not safe. They might just react like sodium and water, who could tell?

Face it, planets are hanging from the celestial ceiling - on wires. Galilei’s herecy has been debunked. The end is nigh! Eat more sawdust! Ahoohaa!

Obviously Austrian terrorist activity (ATA). They secretly want their colony (French Austria) back. Ceterum censeo austriam delendam esse.

Du mich auch.

Some people’s crisis is other people’s chance. Some people just aren’t productive - they can’t shine in a productive or just constructive environment. They are attracted by anything rotten, deeply troubled, just the kind of work where intrigues, brown nosing and opportunism are rewarded and productivity doesn’t count.

#! /usr/bin/bash
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
eject -r

Time of reporting does not necessarily match original time of event. Actually it never does. Any known event is in the past.

deleted by creator

Do you know them? Who’s editor in chief? Can you answer any of the questions I’va asked above? Did you read it?

I didn’t even care about that as much as about their obscurity. But it seems people here are too damned stupid to understand what “obscure” means in case of a news outlet. Makes me wonder a lot less how people are falling for fake/manipulative news or “corporate communications”.

Yes. College students are 5 cents a dozen. They’re useful to extract mortgage interest but they’re still 5 cents a dozen.

No, exactly that’s what I mean by “obscure”. An investment group is not a publisher nor a news agency, not even a media group.When it comes to publishingh that’s just obscure. It’s almost the definition of an obscure media outlet.

“Obscure” means nebulous, not clearly visible, of unclear origin. So, if you’re arguing their obscurity, who exactly are euronews? What are their sources, who are their correspondents, who’s financing them, what is their business address or business model? I’ve wondered about that quite for a while but there’s nothing to find except their data brokering service which seems good evidence that they are not what they claim to be: a news organization. So what exactly are they if not obscure?

Let’s find some experimental evidence.

• 15:13 UTC: sending meme across the flat by instant messager
• 17:00 UTC: getting this (see attachment) as a reply. I decide to take it as a reference to “licking pussy”

Who the fuck rated euronews “Left-Center” and “High” [credibility]? They’re obscure as fuck. Mostly a tracker/data broker with an AI generated “news” frontend spilling clickbait AI slop never quoting any reliable sources.

Where have I heard that before, mein Führer?

Europoean aristocrats haven’t been actual political leaders for a long time. They’re basically just decoration.