the third is only a problem if you’re already looking for a problem.

“Is vacation 28 days” should not be a question, it should be the minimum mandated by law. “Will you work weekends” should rarely be a question, it should be heavily regulated and only allowed for positions where it’s truly required (and never to compensate for management fuckups).

Feels like they are both made up scenarios for rage-bait.

Actually for both of them, the conclusion is correct. “The second they’ll get a better offer they’ll vanish” - no shit, this is how it works under capitalism. Want to keep them? Make a better offer. “The second they find someone to do the same for less pay, they’ll fire you” - no shit, this is how it works under capitalism. Want to make that harder to do? Join or organize a union, and otherwise fight for your labor rights.

I’m doing Nix consulting-type jobs - it can mean anything from simply packaging some stuff for Nix and making a devShell to refactoring existing Nix-based infra (which can be hundreds of thousands of SLOC) to building entirely new developer UX, CI/CD and even production deployments on Nix/NixOS. I’ve also been paid to implement some cool features into Nix itself, fix bugs, etc. I’m really quite happy with the job, even though it could probably pay more :)

Eh, probably if Guix becomes significantly better I’ll switch to it (from NixOS). I really like how seriously they take user freedom, bootstrapping (only 357 bytes of binary to bootstrap everything else from source!) and consistent user interfaces (scheme everywhere). But unfortunately the package repo is just not big and mature enough yet, and declarative configuration options are not as good as they are with NixOS. My job is also Nix-related, and that’s another major reason I’m staying for now.

No, it’s not. It’s a word predictor trained on most of the web. On its own it’s a pretty bad search engine because it can’t reliably produce the training data (that would be overfitting). What it’s kind of good at is predicting what the result would look like if someone asked a somewhat novel question. But then it’s not that good at producing the actual answer to that question, only imitating what the answer would look like.

I’m surprised it took this long. The world is crazy over AI, meaning everyone and their grandma is likely trying to do something like this right now. The fact it took like 3 years for an actual vulnerability “discovered by AI” (actually it seems it was discovered by the researcher filtering out hundreds of false positives?) tells me it sucks ass at this particular task (it also seems to be getting worse, judging by the benchmarks?)

a mobile OS that basically eschews backwards compatibility

I have an app built for Android 4 running on my Android 15 device. It looks ugly but it works. Of course other apps will not be so lucky, but some backwards compat is absolutely there.

a desktop OS that can still run 30 year old applications

Not really, Microsoft is steadily breaking old stuff. For example lot of 10-15 year old software that was doing something hardware-related would be broken now due to driver signing changes/restrictions (e.g. WinRing0 things).

the most popular OS

It’s barely the second most popular OS, after Android. iOS is pretty close behind it. And yet the amount of complaints Windows gets seems to be far higher than that of Android.

Touchscreen (and 2-in-1) support in general is quite good, both Gnome and Plasma (two most popular “desktop environments”) support it well. It should be about as responsive as it is on Windows, because the response time generally comes from hardware and not software. However, I must warn you that I’ve had a similar HP 2-in-1 (although a different model) and there simply wasn’t a Linux driver for the touchscreen so it didn’t work at all; all the other tablet-like features worked fine. I would first check on a liveUSB - the touchscreen should work there the same as it will on the installed distro. If it doesn’t work, well, there’s your answer.