Considering people have been quietly boycotting working with them for over a year now, it seems a little late.

I prefer a little whimsy.

7 for sure.

🐈‍⬛️🐈‍⬛️🐈‍⬛️🐈‍⬛️🐈‍⬛️🐈‍⬛️🐈‍⬛️

The original group got busted years before that.

TROMA YASS

Ah yes, the “windows app” I remote into Linux on. That’s like an ex naming a kid after you levels of crazy.

You obviously haven’t read these or watched that video as that’s covered. It’s literally physics.

I don’t speak German. Generation 3+ only came into use in the West in the last 5-10 years. China has over 150 planned for a reason, watch the link I already provided. They are fundamentally built to avoid the accidents of the past. The standards set by the Chinese on this meet Western standards, hell, they are selling the tech to us.

• Overview: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/advanced-nuclear-power-reactors

• Environmental impacts of Gen 3: https://scholar.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/api/records/9ca88a42-f3ec-47ff-bdf4-fe085a817713/file/0fa0df8ea85e422dc87b706749f77aa6578e7be0cce2b38b5ff2ffaad8c41809.pdf

• A bit behind the development of safety: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/safety-of-nuclear-power-reactors

• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_III_reactor

• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_IV_reactor

More on China, because the YT link already covers this stuff:

• https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1147016/full

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258900422500183X

This is for the older plants. The newer plants are fundamentally different (Gen 3+). There are ways to mitigate these things.

GOOD. BUILD MORE. The newer generations of nuclear plants can recycle their own waste and are basically meltdown proof. It’s a no brainer. Shit is literally alchemy magic.

For the haters: https://youtu.be/5WKQsr9v2C0

https://rxresu.me/

LPT for all of you job seekers.