A tactic used when the person speaking has been recognized to speak according to the rules of the legislature. I don’t really see why that’s relevant here though?

No, see, it should be allowed when we agree with the people making the disruption. Otherwise absolutely not!

The one on All about a week ago was better.

More than a quarter of the independent studies still found neutral outcomes though.

So it’s just Zoomer-speak (“Chat, I farted”) instead?