This comment reminds me of that scene in the incredibles: “The law requires that I answer no!”

Why not both?

Since you’re ignoring points that are inconvenient to your argument, and instead attack me as a person, it is

Insulting you is not an ad-hominem

it literally is, lol

lmao you really think you’re arguing in good faith here? Coming in with an ad hominem right out of the gate, and then completely ignoring an entire third of my comment.

not gonna convince anyone of anything this way. touch some grass.

Tbf, police also has a problem with that, but that’s a different story.

What part of that did you not understand?

Equating police with literal tanks… Alright

Guess I should have specified excessive force. Tbf, police also has a problem with that, but that’s a different story.

People who are defending a regime that is using force on its own people are always bad, no matter who coined the term.

What makes you think that?

Yes, those definitions are correct in a mathematical context. But everyday language works differently.

Comparing implies highlighting similarities, or equating them. You just pointed out a difference.