I would side with you if it wasn’t for the parent thread using the word “insect”. It is definitely some form of nit picking though on my part.

They are crustaceans I think. They form the arthropod* group with insects but aren’t insects themselves. Doesn’t count.

…

The impact from those few odd times someone is smoking near you in an open areas is not proportional to the risk you are attributing to it imo. I am bringing up cars to highlight that.

You must have a hard time being anywhere close to a car if you think you are getting cancer because of a 2 second wiff from some guys cig on a beach. Seems like exaggeration, cancer isnt some lightning bolt that hits you the moment you get a hint of something bad near you.

There are a lot of smells that you are expected to deal with, it seems like kind of a reach. I consider most parfums thoroughly unpleasant but I dont expect it to be made illegal.

That being said, I’m okay with this because of the littering aspect.

• Manipulation by the copyright industry

Wow, I didnt know admiral patrick is a zionist. Might just be an accident tho.

Edit: Not an accident, there is a pattern. He even downvoted the same thread about the airstrike on three different subs in the space of a minute.

Sea slugs! (The second and third one mostly)

Although that is true, words take on their own meaning over time. Likewise, King Nimrod was not an idiot.

The alternative is having Hollywood own every video generation model.

Same for music, 70% of all music globally is owned by three record companies. Elton is being asked by them to do this, because the public wouldnt be so sympathic with Warner Bros Studio in the headline instead.

If its the first link on google, I usually just give them the lmgtfy link to make it clear that they are being lazy.

I hated it at first but then I started to leave pocket on and click links every now and then since I figured they got revenue out of it. I don’t use it often but its a shame to see it go now that I kind of like it.

No son of mine is gonna run country.

If the dems had catered to voters instead of kneeling in front of a foreign apartheid state and its genocide, Harris would have won.

Politicians can choose what they represent and the platform they put forward. I don’t want to have to vote for genocide so democracy can live again, I want the dems to drop their pro-genocide stance. Blaming voters is the opposite of asking for change.

Since we are in a post election situation, by constantly scape goating voters, you are doing one sided criticism.

Trump helps genocide and he is a bad guy, Biden and Harris help genocide but the voters should have accepted it essentially.

If we refuse to hold the dems accountable for their actions which directly led to Trump winning, they will plot the same course for the next election.

I’ve always seen the anti-AI movement as pro-corporation. It’s mostly for the benefit of the copyright industry while its already quite easy to decouple yourself from the corporate aspects of AI with its open source options.

Although not voting was the wrong move, It’s important to hold the democrats accountable imo. They essentially lost the election because they considered genocide more important then their consituents.

The fact is that Gazas fate would have been the same under both party. The way forward is to demand change from the democratic party to avoid such scenarios. Blaming voters implies it wasnt the democrats at fault in the first place for pushing apathy and genocide as their main platform. Even worse, it implies genocide somehow shouldnt be a voting issue.

“Message to all players: Resetting simulation in 24 hours”