• candyman337@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Reminder for those that comment that hate and rude comments are against the community’s rules

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yea. There is “having personal tastes” but a lot of these comments are just straight up judgmental of other people’s choices of personal expression and using this post as an excuse to espouse some pretty harmful rhetoric.

  • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I inherently detest the concept of a “beauty standard”. Something so subjective to each individual experience as “beauty” shouldn’t have a standard, and a mentality or social culture that tries to establish or reinforce them is something I believe to be highly problematic.

    Like in this very post, all the people who are admonishing body modification (injections, implants, piercings, tattoos, etc…). That has been a thing humans have done since ancient times. It is just a form of personal expression, there is nothing inherently wrong with the practice itself. It is the social expectations that makes those things appear uncomfortable at first glance instead of just a different but equally valid form of personal expression. A lot of the comments around them are very judgmental of the assumed reasons behind doing it, though, and it is because of societal “beauty standards” that people behave and think this way.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Most of them, but by far makeup.

    If someone enjoys it and wants to, I don’t judge.

    But I seriously never saw a person who looks better with makeup. Even light makeup ( which can look good) still looks worse than just natural.

    Also there is this vicious cycle where heavy makeup users have worse skin and more pimples so they feel pressure to but heavier makeup, which in turn worsens the skin condition.

    People, be happy, love yourself, you are pretty for who you are.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I like how the standard has fractured and there isn’t really a standard now, but I do also kind of like the obviously fake bodies being the standard because an insistence on natural beauty is more oppressive than the idea of beauty as something you do, an art or achievement, even a purchase.

    If beauty like that is something you choose, I am free to choose it or not. If it’s just by luck of birth, that sucks so bad. When I was a gawky tall stick insect of a teenager and the only girls considered pretty were the short and stacked, there was no way to meet that standard.

    Later the tide shifted but as I didn’t grow up feeling my body could ever be mainstream sexy, I didn’t get attached to that - I do have hangups but they are my own. I just try to stay in shape, have good hair, take care of my skin and let the rest be.

    But I think my unpopular opinion is beauty as something you do - makeup, style, fitness, is more democratic than insistence on symmetry of features or a particular height or build, the idea of “natural beauty” is worse. Beauty should be a choice, a hobby, a project, do or not.

    In terms of what I do not currently understand, it’s the moustaches. Young men with weedy little moustaches, straight men with moustaches that scream gay to me, the unopposed highway patrol/1980s gay man moustache I can’t wait for that trend to pass.

  • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Overly full lips. There’s a bandwidth there where it should fit the rest of the facial features. Filling them up with collagen just almost never looks good.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Personally, I’d extend it to the entirety of the bimbo look. Why the fuck would anyone want to look like a cheap sex doll!? (ok well I can kinda’ understand it as a fetish thing, but when ever parts of that look extend to “beauty” like huge lips… ugggh)

  • NotNotMike@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve always disliked plastic surgery, botox and heavy makeup. But that’s normal enough

    My real hot take is I am disgusted by long, fake nails. They make my skin crawl. They’re so cumbersome, I truly don’t understand how people love with them

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      This response makes me take back what I said about your intent in my other comments. This thread is gross.

    • grte@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I truly don’t understand how people love with them

      Very carefully.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You and me on both counts dude, fuuuuuu—

      So disgusting. And it looks sooo fake, like they don’t even make an effort to look real. They are thick as a bear claw bruh, looks like some fungus growing under them talons, Jesus. Get that nasty shit out of here.

    • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      17 hours ago

      welcome to the evening news, man creates thread so he can bitch about Black women. more at 5 when he phones back in to say how he’s entitled to his opinion.

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Truly ironic people are trying to say you’re the racist for calling someone else out for espousing racist rhetoric.

        • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The racist is the one bitching about long nails, a predominant standard of beauty in black culture, and how much it makes them uncomfortable.

          Like, no one needs to hear your judgement of someone else’s choice of personal expression. Ever heard the phrase “ain’t got nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all”? This is where that applies.

          • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Long nails are a thing with women of all races. I wouldn’t call it predominantly black. I’d call it predominantly tacky.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Pure white teeth. I prefer ivory shades- not yellow, just the natural ivory. I’ve had salespeople approach me offering teeth whitening products and it terrifies me.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      When they’re done badly, it’s very noticeable and terrible. When they aren’t done, it’s fine. Not everybody is looking for curves and puffy lips. Presumably, there’s a bunch of successful injections you never notice, but on the balance that’s not a very good record.

  • CocaineShrimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Tabs over spaces, always

    … wait, you’re asking in asklemmy, not programming…

    Uhhh… that thing where people glue little strands of hair to their forehead in an arc

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Not really, surprisingly. The “tab” terminology is a hangover from the typewriter days, when pressing the tab key would move your carriage to the left (i.e. sending the typing position towards the right) to the point where the tab stop was, which may or may not have been user configurable depending on the age or fanciness level of your typewriter. On mechanical models this involved sliding a little arrowhead shaped mechanical dingus up at the top over the carriage, a skeuomorph that’s still present in basically every computer word processing application even today.

        This was to allow operators to easily write tabular data, i.e. tables or columns, which would be inset from the left margin by a consistent amount, and typically much further inboard than the indent at the beginning of a paragraph would be. The latter was usually accomplished with a small number of spaces instead. And this is why the key is called “tab” and not “ind” or something.

        This got carried over to word processors and then to computers kind of by default. But interestingly (if you’re the right kind of nerd to be interested by that sort of thing, anyway) early 8 bit microcomputers that were not envisaged with word processing or a typewriter-esque paradigm in mind conspicuously lacked a tab key. The Commodore 64 and Vic 20, TI-99, Acorn Electron, and certainly the ZX Spectrum all leap to mind.

        But the original IBM PC definitely had a tab key, which was almost certainly carried directly over from IBM’s Selectric typewriters. So we’ve had it ever since. The notion of there being a “tab character” of some greater-than-space width lent it to being used for first line indents for a while, but the prominence of HTML and its dogged insistence on collapsing whitespace – especially at the beginning of lines – eventually put a stop to that and caused practically everybody to switch to double line breaks to separate paragraphs instead. Except for writing code, which can involve a whole bunch of indentation to many, many levels of depth.

        Indenting the starts of paragraphs was an even older hangover from printing presses, and that’s another whole damn rabbit hole anyway.

    • BingoBongoBang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I read an article / listened to a podcast where a visually impaired person said that tabs are much better because they can configure how wide they are rendered to better accommodate them and now In would prefer to use tabs. Still all customers i have seem to use only spaces.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I am more into spaces, but as long as the indentation is done consistently i can tolerate tabs.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean, how could using tabs not be consistent when only comparing to spaces? Seems to me like spaces give infinitely more opportunity to fuck up indentation.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Calling anything about beauty a standard.

    Obviously fake anything. Boobs. Lips. Butt.

    Trying too hard in general. Just be you.

    I get we’re not perfect and we all have insecurities. Why are they called love handles? But people are just people. We’re all human.