Original question by @Wahots@pawb.social

I think art deco is one of my favorites. It still has a clean, modern look that ages surprisingly well, even a century later.

  • countrypunk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Frutiger Aero. This is what the future should have looked like. It’s a beautiful balance between nature and technology. I love the glossy, transpartent, rounded nature of it all. The colors are bright and fresh but relaxing at the same time.

    I’m also a big fan of mid century modern. It does a good job at incorporating a natural look. On the outside, the buildings are usually low profile and blend into the landscape well. On the inside, there’s a lot of nice, quality natural materials like wood and stone that are used throughout.

    • countrypunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      More Frutiger Aero photos because I can’t stop thinking about how beautiful it is:

      One thing about it is that it ain’t the most homely of aesthetics and architectures. It’s almost always in the context of a workplace, airport, shopping center, etc. In an ideal world I’d live in a mid century modern house and work in a frutiger aero workplace.

      Edit: just found this really cool website https://frutigeraeroarchive.org/

      • countrypunk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, one thing that I’m not a fan of with some of the pictures that I selected is all the white. I like it better when there’s other colors and white is just the accent.

  • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    Brutalism always fascinated me, i tried to model some building in 3d modeling tools in this style, churches public squares you name it. These huge, empty and vast monuments to the industrial nature of a building are like monolyths in a city. They claim their existance and you can’t ignore them.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Looks like brutalism to me. Not sure if there might be some more specific subcategory I’m not familiar with, but generally anything using big geometric slabs of concrete is brutalist.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not sure what it’s called but I’d like to see buildings looking like this again

    This is the Library of Congress in Washington DC

    • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Neoclassical, palladian, renaissance. The majour difference from similar archictectural styles is the geometric perfection of the spaces and the lack of irregular features. Opposite of that, baroque is all about overdecorating things and having irregular features, like a non spherical ‘barrueco’ pearl. Hence the name.

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I admit it’s not my favorite, but I do still love that it’s actually distinctive and has a specific “vibe”. You look at it and you know exactly when it’s from and what it’s about.

      I can’t think of any ‘style’ in the last 20 years that has that.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    And the Art Deco crowd wins the poll!

    Had cousins whose entire home, bar the sun room, was Art Deco. Not just the furniture and paintings, even the magazines and lighters and ash trays. Quite a collection!