Just how greedy some professors can be.
Like the one that had a publishing deal with Pearson. He wrote his own textbook, charged $700 for it, then made you remove parts from the book so it made used copies of the book worthless.
That sounds like something news worthy with name and everything
I’d be switching classes during drop/add if that happened.
I’m very grateful of having a publicly funded university. I pay around 70€ a year for the student union and another around 70€ for student health care. That’s all I pay, includes the school, materials, and free healthcare.
That when actually challenged I couldn’t justify eating meat. It was just a part of a long conversation with another meat eating woman in completely unrelated majors.
Honestly that sort of thing is one of the most valuable parts of college imo. I was in a place dedicated to learning and thinking, surrounded by people also dedicated to it and it meant that I had a lot of deep intellectual conversations. Those years didn’t just give me a career, they molded me into someone genuinely educated
How completely stupid a professor can be. My parting words to him were basically “You have no idea what you are talking about.” And everyone in the room but the professor knew I was right.
Computer science students multiple years into the course think I’m a hacker for using the linux terminal
I once showed that
trickfeature - opening the terminal - to an Apple Genius Bar employee once. His brains almost fell out of his ear he was so surprised.Classmates of mine who moved to Linux in college, 20 years ago, all graduated at least a semester later than I did. To be fair, I got my pirated copy of everything from them.
What is this even trying to say?
When we had to team up for lab assignments I was working with a like-minded guy and we did everything Linux when the assignment didn’t specifically specify that we had to use windows. The teacher was constantly updating the wording of his assignments and asked us to put a little bit of windows in there. We were way ahead of the rest of class and had plenty of time left to switch the windows parts in and out like nothing. That was 12 years ago.
If it was possible on Linux we used Linux, if not then we used windows. We used a very pragmatic approach, but favored Linux where possible.
Granted, linux is probably much more user friendly now. Although I still see mysterious errors on boot and cannot boot into newer kernel versions. How peculiar.
I’ve used a Linux desktop for 25 years now
Yeah, it’s gotten a bit easier, just like Windows and Mac.
Not that much has changed, and frankly, most of basic Linux really isn’t that hard, it’s just getting people off the shitty windows concepts that is the hard part.
I am getting into Linux now with Bazzite, but back then, Windows was still okay. Nowadays, Windows is as enshittified as MSN.com was back in the day.
It has been proven that each mathematical reasoning system* either has a statement that cannot be proven true or false, or a statement that can be proven both true or false. In simpler terms, it has been proven that we can’t prove everything.
Gödels incompleteness theorem if anyone wants to look it up.
- only holds for reasoning systems that can reason about numbers
That all the shit I was told about making 60k out of college and doubling it in 4 years, how I would need college to get a cushy desk job, how without college I would never afford a house or a car, that my loans would be paid off in 10 years or forgiven in 20… All of that was a fucking lie.
Colleges will happily take 80 grand from teenagers and give them absolutely nothing for it.
I learned women actually don’t have the same access to higher education as men. That misogyny and rape culture is real and heavily affect people’s lives in present day. And that it’s about isolated incidents with bad apples, but about the structures around bad incidents, and how they systematically facilitate bad situations, don’t help or silence victims.
I genuinely believed it was safe to give my peers the benefit of the doubt and assume that their ironically bigoted jokes weren’t their actual views. And it was heartbreaking to realize that that is not an assumption you can make. You don’t know people’s values unless they tell you, seriously and genuinely, straight from the heart. You cannot infer values from ironic jokes, and you cannot assume that the nice people around you share your core values, that you’d otherwise take for granted that everyone but lunatics agree with. You don’t know before you ask.
I learned that humor isn’t always innocent. That not everyone who hears you make an “ironically bigoted” joke laughs because of its absurdity - they laugh because they agree. They think you agree with their bigoted views and values, and your joke further cements their worldview, that everyone thinks like them, everyone else is just too scared to say it openly. That jokes can be used as a weapon to create a culture where i.e. overt “ironic” racism is considered normal, and genuine conversations about real racism is taboo.
None of this was in the curriculum. It came from experiencing the social setting and viewing the effects of a broken administrative system at an “elite” engineering college.
I was not a feminist when I walked into my STEM education, and I was when I left.
I learned women actually don’t have the same access to higher education as men.
You’re right - women have significantly better access to higher education than men, and have demonstrably better education outcomes as a result.
For example, women are significantly more likely to receive scholarships and grants than men in undergrad.
Partially as a result of this lack of access, men have dropped to almost 40% of undergrad students, while women make up nearly 60%. Women also receive more doctorates than men, and almost twice as many Master’s degrees as men.
I’m not trying to minimize the bigotry that you observed (or faced), but it’s objectively false to claim that women have worse access to higher education than men.
OP didn’t indicate their gender.
Thanks, good point. I’ve edited my comment.
How low the expectations are for a putatively “adult” level of education
You can calculate how long a pencil can stand on its tip before falling using quantum physics.
Basically a version of this was on our freshman accelerated physics final, and no one got it right so our professor happily explained it to us the next day.
It was pretty much the same as is described here.
https://thephysicsvirtuosi.com/posts/old/how-long-can-you-balance-a-quantum-pencil/
Higher education is a waste of money for the vast majority of degrees, even STEM ones.
Let me guess, you went to uni in the U.S.A.?
Whether or not an irregular verb retains its irregularity depends largely on how much it is used in everyday life. If it’s a common word, it’s more likely to stay irregular, because we’re frequently reminded of the “correct” form. If it’s a rare word, the irregularity tends to disappear over time because we simply forget. That’s why “to be” couldn’t be more irregular (it’s used enough to retain its forms) and the past participle of “to prove” is slowly becoming regular “proved” (it’s rare enough to be forgotten).
yes i like language very much
Edit: typo
It’s also interesting how the past-tense of “to dive” has changed over recent generations. “Dived” is supposed to be standard, yet people turn it into “dove” so frequently, it’s becoming the new normal.
I resist because I’m literate enough to know that “dove” is a bird that rhymes with “love”.
Wait, what’s the other option for past tense ‘to prove’?
“I have proven”
That would be the past participle wouldn’t it?
Yeah, that’s what I said earlier.
Ah, duh. Interesting that it’s moving to the more typical “ed” ending
Exactly, that’s the expected path: the irregular form disappears as more and more speakers forget it and instead, “on the fly”, apply the general rules of word formation in their language. Over time the “regularised” form becomes the accepted, “correct” one.
OP has just proven their point.
That I spent years developing proficiency in my language and expanding my vocabulary to get accepted, only to be told to write simplified English in journalism school. Then they doubled down in my business classes to write for a 6th grade education and those who don’t speak natively.
Ya I was surprised that that became the style they liked in my university history classes. None of that rhetoric bullshit.
One of the most accurate and successful theories in physics contains the single worst prediction and isn’t mathematically rigorous at all.
Doing calculations with it feels like doing vibes based maths, and you spend a lot of time doing things like: “oops divided by zero guess I’ll cancel it out by multiplying by zero” and it works.
In engineering we have a simmillar thing for some cases where we replace 0 with a variable that is 0 at the limit but not 0 itself then continue on like nothing happened. It all cancels out at the end but feels so wrong.
Can you give an example?
In control dynamics u have a transfer function and need to determine the Routh-Hurwitz criterion it will sometimes give u division by 0 errors so u sub in a variable and say its almost zero but not quite and continue on like nothing happened.
Eg determining the stability of a system with characteristic eq of A(s) = 3s4+6s3+2s^2+4s+5=0
If u do a RH array u will end up with a zero which then will give u (4*0−30)/0 so u sub in 𝜀 for 0 giving (4𝜀−30)/𝜀 and continue on. That eq obviously evaluates to negative infinity. U are essentially just saying 𝜀 is an infinity small positive number ie it is the number next to 0 on the positive side.
EDIT: If the markdown is messed up the eq should be
A(s) = 3s**4+6s**3+2s**2+4s+5=0
When using ** as super notation
control dynamics
Well, that’s a relief! That’s a completely different kind of engineering than I studied, so I can stop being worried that there was something I was supposed to have learned but didn’t.
Its general mechanical background stuff
My degree is in civil.
Ahh. Mechanical before shit starts to move.
π=√10
π=√10=√g=3=e=c*10^-8
It’s truly the universal constant
Physics in general has not caught up to the fact that locality isn’t a thing. Nobel prizes were handed out for this in I think 22… And people still think the notion of spacetime can be taken seriously. It can’t.
What does that mean?
Which part
locality. what was it supposed to be? and why doesn’t it actually exist? what model “replaces” it, if any?
maybe the meaning of spacetime isn’t obvious either, and I just misunderstand what it means
In short locality states that things are only directly affected by their immediate surroundings. This is provably untrue in quantum mechanics.
Thanks!
You know how you get COVID from being in the same room as someone who sneezes on you or something? It’s that.
Non locality is when you get COVID from someone the next state over.
That I am way stupider than I thought I was. No seriously, constantly failing and seeing how little I actually know made me question my life choices.
At a certain point, you need to be force which pushes you forward. I saw a lot of intelligent people fail because they no longer had the external stimulus to go to class.
Also, it is easier to manipulate people in positions of power, but you have to understand how they think and are rewarded. There is a reason why a lot of liberal arts education is focused on having people understand others.
Also, the liberal arts education of a century ago was basically a degree which was intended to make managers. Along with it, the extra-curricular activities were an important part of the education, but just what happened in class.
Why is it easier to manipulate people in power? What makes them more vulnerable to manipulation?
A lot of the official liberal arts college education goes into understanding the perspectives of others, with a bias to people in power and their power structures. While not an explicit thing they are teaching you, college is teaching you how to understand power structures and the people within them.
If you have a better understanding of power structures, it becomes easier to push said structures to achieve your own goals since you can speak to power structures in their language instead of your own in order to get what you want.
Also, a lot of the clubs and other extra-curricular activities are designed to create small power bases to practice these techniques on.
It is a lot easier to get what you want when you can speak on other people’s terms.
Where can I learn more about this? Recommend any books or any techniques? I’d love to learn more about power structures, and people in power.
In workplaces, I’ve seen people put themselves into positions of power, get roles their not qualified for, and influence managers to dislike people. Office politics.
There are a lot of historical books on various topics; i feel like a good spot is to pick an era and dive in.
Also, everything is politics, especially office work. Part of the purpose of college wasn’t just to get people to gain knowledge, but to work up Bloom’s Taxonomy by applying knowledge learned and analyzing it. Reading books might get you knowledge and maybe comprehension, but the value is in those higher levels.
That teaching isn’t the point. It’s getting research grants or funding. So much energy was spent on that. Students came 2nd.
Students came 2nd.
Right. Yes. At least second. For sure.
There’s not like, another kind of research we should save a spot for? No? Okay. 2nd is good.